| Class Information | Examination Procedures | Sample Questions in the Quizes | Interactive Communication | Supplemental Notes | Answers to Quizzes All exams are graded on a 0 - 100% scale. A. Science There will be two quizzes, date for each quiz announced in advance. The grade for each quiz will count toward 33.3% of the final grade (i.e., total 66.6%). B. Ethics The ethics portion of the course (one quiz) will count as 33.3% of the overall course grade – equal to one quiz in the science part of the course. A (quizzes # 1and 2) + B (quiz # 3)
+ 10 points (if class attendance is 90% or better) =
Total number of points / 3 = Final letter grade, according to the
"Uniform Grading" policy listed below. SAMPLE QUESTIONS IN THE QUIZZES The quizzes will be based on the contents of the textbook, reading assignments and the additional materials discussed in the class. Please carefully read all the questions and provide the appropriate answers. Values in parentheses indicate the number of points carried by that question.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Instructors Lecture Hours and Location Class Attendance Student Hours Course Pre-requisites |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Perspectives |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Background International Perspective Public Ethical Perspective |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Course Information |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Course Objectives/Audience Course Topics Course Reading Material The Ethics: Additional Materials |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exams |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Examination
Procedures Interactive Communication Supplemental Notes Answers to Quizzes |
EXAM DATES Quiz # 1: October 8 Quiz #2: November 14 Quiz # 3: December 12
Interactive Communication A. Science Response to unanswered questions in the class and answers to the questions in the quizzes (after each quiz) will be posted on this web site. B. Ethics Information similar to the science portion can also be found at the web site. UNIFORM GRADING POLICY*
____________________________ Supplemental Reading assignment: Chapter 6 The Minamata Disease: A Case Study http://www.env.go.jp/en/topic/minamata2002/ Summary Notes: I. 1. Rapid industrial growth with no environmental concern (US, 1940 - versus Japan, 1940 -) 2. Symptoms seen, but cause unknown (Minamata, 1956 versus stipple of grape, 1952) 3.Methyl mercury (acetaldehyde production, primary pollutant) versus ozone (photochemical smog, secondary pollutant)
Disease of the Central nervous system A. Sensory, visual disturbance B. Impairment of hearing C. Loss of equilibrium D. Cerebral infantile paralysis Bhopal Disaster Comparison Pulmonary Edema
Methyl mercury content in the body = Intake – Exclusion = Steady state or threshold = ~ amount of continuous intake IV. Indicators of Hg Accumulation: Fish, Shell Fish, Human hair Consequence: 1956 - Minamata (2,955 people, symptomatic) versus Cause: Methyl mercury (water transport) versus methyl isothiocynate ? cyanide (atmospheric transport) V. Comparison of post-mortem costs in million $
Minamata: 2,955 cases (disease). ~ Ave. $26,000/capita/year Bhopal: 600,000 survivors. Ave. $550/capita/one
time ___________________________ ____________________________ Notes # 1. Textbook: Air Pollution, People and Plants by Krupa Chaper 4: Transport of Air Pollution Across Regional, National and International Boundaries 1. The occurrence of acidic precipitation is a classic example of trans-boundary transport of air pollution. It is a regional, inter-regional and continental scale environmental concern. 2. Acidic precipitation is defined as precipitation with a pH value of less than 5.68. That is considered as the value for distilled water in equilibrium with atmospheric carbon dioxide at 25 °C at the sea level. However, that definition is questionable because: (a) A pH value of 5.68 will be produced by the dissolution of ~330 ppm carbon dioxide in water. The present day carbon dioxide concentration is ~370 ppm. That will result in a pH value of ~5.4, and (b) Rain is a very dilute, highly unbuffered, complex mixture of chemical constituents that represents more than simply carbon dioxide in its dissolved state. Nevertheless, rain in general is acidic. 3. The acidity of precipitation has been mainly related to the emissions of sulfur dioxide (being converted to sulfuric acid) and the oxides of nitrogen (being converted to nitric acid). However, the contribution of those acids to the acidity of rainfall is highly variable in space and in time. 4. A particular precipitation event will vary in its composition between locations and no two-precipitation events at a particular location will have a similar chemical composition. 5. Rainfall contains both insoluble and soluble chemical constituents. The soluble constituents exist as ions (positively charged cations, e.g., hydrogen or H+ and negatively charged anions, e.g., sulfate or SO42–. 6. Statistical correlations are used to establish relationships between the cations and the anions. Correlations (–1 to + 1 scale) are based on the variability in one parameter against the corresponding variability in another parameter.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Types of Acidity (H+)* --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- H2SO4 = Sulfuric acid SO42– = Sulfate ion NH3 = Ammonia (NH4)2SO4 = Ammonium sulfate NH4+ = Ammonium ion NO2– = Nitrite ion NO3– = Nitrate ion * Alkalinity is represented by OH– -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ACIDIC PRECIPITATION (Summary of Conclusions) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. Should the pH of unpolluted rain be considered to be 5.68? (Equilibrium of 330 ppm CO2 in water at 25 °C and 1 atmospheric pressure or 740 mm Hg). 2. Evidence from several publications suggest that the background pH of rain should be between 5.2 and 5.4. 3. There are a number of insoluble and soluble chemical constituents in rain. 4. It is the soluble constituents that are of immediate interest in ecological effects assessments. 5. Acidic rain is considered to be largely due to the presence of H2SO4 and HNO3. 6. Such a conclusion is drawn from statistical correlations between the ions in rainfall. 7. Overall, there is a spatial gradient of increasing rainfall activity from the west to the east in the US. 8. There is a spatial gradient of increasing rainfall activity from the southwest to the northeast in Minnesota. 9. There are significant spatial variabilities in the concentrations of ions in rainfall. 10. There are significant spatial variabilities in the correlations between ions in rainfall. Thus, different locations may have different degrees of correlations between H and SO4 and NO3 ions. 11. In Minnesota from 65 to 85% of SO4 and NO3 are in a non-acid form (essentially neutralized by other chemical constituents in the atmosphere, e.g., ammonium ion). 12. There are differences in the composition of the rainfall, depending on the meteorological relationships between emission and receptor regions. 13. The relationship between pH and ion concentrations in rainfall is parabolic in its nature, governed by regional scale climatology. 14. There is a distinct seasonality in the occurrence of high SO4 (summer) and NO3 (winter) in precipitation. 15. In Minnesota there are weak acids (organic) in rainfall at concentrations higher than strong acids. __________________________________________________ Notes # 2. Textbook: Air Pollution, People and Plants by Krupa Chapter 5: Air Pollution and Global Climate Change Vegetation Responses: I. There are three types of terrestrial plants: C3, C4 and CAM (Crassulacean Acid Metabolism) C3 plants: Plants that use rubisco (Ribulosebiphosphate carboxylase) to make a three-carbon compound as the first stable product of carbon fixation. These plants may lose up to 50% of their recently fixed carbon through photorespiration. More than 95% of earth's plant species can be characterized as C3 plants. C4 plants: Plants that use PEP (phosphoenol pyruvate) carboxylase during initial carbon fixation to make a four-carbon compound that is subsequently transferred to specialized cells where carbon dioxide is internally released and refixed using rubisco. This phenomenon greatly reduces carbon loss by photorespiration, and in many cases, it completely inhibits it. Less than 1% of earth's plant species can be characterized as C4 plants. CAM plants: Plants that close their stomata during the day to reduce water loss and open them at night for carbon uptake. PEP carboxylase nocturnally fixes carbon into a four-carbon compound that is accumulated within vacuoles. During the day, this compound internally releases carbon dioxide, which is then re-fixed using rubisco. This phenomenon also effectively inhibits carbon loss by photorespiration. Only about 3 to 4% of earth's plant species can be characterized as CAM plants. Examples include – Cacti, Pineapple.
(Figure Credit: http://tidepool.st.usm.edu/crswr/c3vsc4.html)
(Figure Credit: http://www.woodrow.org/teachers/esi/1999/princeton/projects/c3_c4/Group3web.html)
12. The actual or specific contribution of each pathway (with the exception of soils and roots) to the night-time carbon dioxide concentrations have not been quantified due to a lack of appropriate experimental methods, but they have been calculated. Additional Notes _________________________________________
10. In sulfur deficient soils, low levels of sulfur dioxide can stimulate plant growth.
12. Chronic Exposure: Several ppb for days, weeks and whole growth season, with periodic, random occurrences of short-term (e.g., few to several minutes) peaks or episodes. May or may not result in injury symptoms, but can result in growth and yield reductions. The frequency of occurrences of the peaks or episodes and the cumulative exposure (concentration X duration) fit best with observed effects. 13. List of some agronomic and horticultural crops that are relatively sensitive to SO2:
14. Selected examples of agricultural crop species that have exhibited visible foliar injury under ambient conditions due to sulphur (SO2) contaminants from industrial point or source complexes:
_____________________________________________________________ Some approaches to the recognition of air pollutant effects on crops and native vegetation _____________________________________________________________ 1. Mostly typical foliar symptoms of acute injury. Not systemic; does not spread (time course studies required). 2. Similar symptoms on unrelated plant species growing in an affected area. Listings of sensitive plant species known for major air pollutants. 3. Correlation between foliar injury and soil moisture availability (differences between irrigated vs. non-irrigated fields). 4. Maximum crop or plant sensitivity during 2-3 months after onset of growth. 5. Foliar injury on leaves at full expansion or 2nd and 3rd year needles on conifers. 6. Random distribution of injured plants in a field. Infectious diseases start and spread from infection centers. Further, specific infectious pathogens in general are genus/family specific, there are exceptions, however [e.g., specific – late blight of potato does not spread to soybean or corn; exception – Pseudomonas (bacterial wilt) can spread to tobacco or to potato (same host family) or Verticillium albo-atrum wilt can spread to potato or maple (different host families)]. 7. Use of biological indicators and/or native vegetation. 8. Foliar analysis (e.g., sulfur; fluorine occur in elevated levels in stressed plants). Negative results in microscopy and Koch's postulate (step 1; isolation). Negative results in re-inoculation with extracts of injured plant tissue. 9. Comparisons of charcoal-filtered versus unfiltered treatments and/or comparisons of differences in geographic space. 10. Crop cultivar and intra-species differences in response. 11. Chemical spray tests for protection vs. no protection against air pollution injury. __________________________________________________________ Factors governing the joint effects of air pollutants on plants ________________________________________________________ 1. The physical form of the pollutant. 2. The chemistry of the pollutant. 3. Pollutant dose (concentration and exposure duration) and uptake. 4. Co-occurrence of a pollutant with the others (simultaneous, inverse, sequential, random etc.). 5. Toxicological properties of the pollutant. 6. Ratios between pollutant concentrations. 7. Growth conditions of the plant. 8. Growth stage of the plant. 9. Avoidance – compensation – repair – stress. 10. No effect – hormesis – negative effects. 11. Nature of the plant response parameter measured. 12. Positive X negative effect interactions. 13. Intra- and interspecies effects. 14. Biotic and abiotic stress or stimulation factors. 15. Pre-disposition (decrease versus increase) in response and time series of exposure and response. 16. Holistic approach. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2004 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Last modified on: November 30, 2005